Secuction question

[DarkCade]

Dark Cade here and I was wondering to all of ya'all out there what is the best way to seduce a woman?
Please feel free to respond any suggestions are greatly appreciated
DarkCade

[MajorMax]

NeuroLinguistic Programming, and it has been around for a while. Do a search on Google for Ross Jeffries - this guy turned NLP into what he calls the Science of Speed Seduction. It's interesting to say in the least. I'm not saying any more about it as I don't want to appear as advertising it but NLP it is THE way to seduce ANY woman, ANY time with the least possible effort.

[voland]

neurolinguistic programming is for guys who have a tendancy to overthink the subject of how to pick up women, and men who are grasping at straws.

Hands down, the best site out there for understanding/seducing women is: .angelfire. /rebellion/nabis/

It's a completely free site. A bit lengthy to read, but worth it.

[ticklesuzy]

I have no clue what neurolingistic programming is but it doesn't sound seductive at all -- infact it sounds like avery impersonal approach to something that is innately personal.

If ya have to get fancy, then try the multisensory approach.
a nice atmosphere, delicious aroma, casual touching, great food
(but not heavy and filling) music.

Interesting but little known fact:
Men have aprox. 50 sexual nerves in their bodies...guess where most are...??...if you guessed the groin area you get the candy.

Women have over 200 sexual nerves....if you guessed from head to toes... you win again.

Stimulate the senses and you can't help but set a good mood for seduction.

And just to keep an open mind I'll check out the lastest, greatest, newest approach--I hate to miss anything good.

[meg]

Just send me a guy that is capable of being himself, whether he is shy, out going, it doesn't matter. I dislike being with someone that appears to be following steps in a text book, or acting like something they aren't! Meg

[ticklesuzy]

AMEN

[ticklesuzy]

meg
:devil: tee hee don't ya just love a guy in a cowboy hat!?!?

[ticklesuzy]

:blush: :wall:
pleas ignore that above comment---it would have made more sense if I had posted it on the right thread which is even on another board. :D

[insecurity]

Originally posted by ticklesuzy
:blush: :wall:
pleas ignore that above comment---it would have made more sense if I had posted it on the right thread which is even on another board. :D


hahahaha it still seems like relevant question for this thread:D

[ticklesuzy]

Yeah I guess a cowbot hat is good anytime!!!!

I was replying to a thread on the senual board and somehow messed around and got it here???!!!APPARENTLY EASILY LOST?!?!

[Marinerblue]

Voland,

Sorry to have to say this, but he is just re-hashing the teachings of Ross Jeffries. I also don't think much of his comments about "women as sub-standard human beings." Last time I checked it was 2002, not the Dark ages.

Most men overlook the fact that being interested, asking intelligent questions and maintaining eye contact is incredibly attractive to a woman.

I think memorising lines from a script will just not work, but if some of the techniques are added in naturally, it can have a positive effect.

[voland]

I don't know where you got the idea that I was rehashing the teachings of Ross Jeffries. I only know who he is from a friend of mine... I've never read his stuff myself.

As for living in the dark ages; man isn't a different creature at all from that period, only the society we live in is different. What worked then will work now. Women want a man, not a wimp.

You'd better go re-read my posting. I said: neurolinguistic programming "doesn't work."

[meg]

Everyone is different, Every relationship is different. What I want in a man will not be the same as some other women wants. What she wants will not be what I want. If we all wanted the same thing, there wouldn't be so many different kinds of clothing, food or fetishes. Meg

[Marinerblue]

Voland:
Fair enough.

All the best with your techniques, mate.

[Karbonopsinos]

Originally posted by voland
I don't know where you got the idea that I was rehashing the teachings of Ross Jeffries. I only know who he is from a friend of mine... I've never read his stuff myself.

As for living in the dark ages; man isn't a different creature at all from that period, only the society we live in is different. What worked then will work now. Women want a man, not a wimp.

You'd better go re-read my posting. I said: neurolinguistic programming "doesn't work."

That's only from your demented evolutionist perspective. I don't believe in that nonsense, so I actually believe I'm in the image of God and not descended from some bone-smashing, polygamous ape.

Sorry if you consider him your ancestor, but I wouldn't suggest imitating him....it tends to drive off the decent women.

[ticklesuzy]

I read up on him when I saw a post on here somewhere. If someone has to spend time learning phrases they think will trigger sexual intimacy, I feel they are pathetic and need to spend time learning how to communicate instead.

Yes,I want a strong partner,
strong enough to listen,
strong enough to really talk to me,
strong enough to choose tenderness,
strong enough to only choose violence when it is the only way out
strong enough to know that physical strengh is simply one of his many skills.

Bullies need not apply.
and someone who would pay $300-400, for the "insights" of ross jeffries should not reproduce at all.

[voland]

Meg, I'm not going to get into it with you again. Suffice it to say, that there are basic similarities that make up people (if a man acts a certain way, he'll draw the majority of women to him, and vice versa) I agree that every relationship is different... only an idiot would disagree.

Marinerblue: those aren't just my techniques, but the techniques of every successful player I've ever met. But to each his own... thanks for hearing me out.

Karbonopsinos: You are the one living in the dark ages. In this day and age I'm astounded that anywould would still deny the fact of evolution... but again, to each his own.

[Marinerblue]

Ticklesuzy:

Ross is at the stage now where, even if the women are aware of what he is doing, it still works. I heard of a recent situation where he was on a TV show and the female producer made a comment about how his tricks wouldn't work on her.

Despite this, she agreed to meet him for coffee later and said that even though she knew he was doing something, it still worked. She still felt strongly attracted to him.

It is not a case of memorising patterns, but communicating with another person. The reason why it works is because it requires interest and effort to find out exactly what makes a woman feel good. If a person can make you feel positive emotions and then link that to themselves, you will naturally become more attracted to that person. The process is all about making the woman feel great. Don't you feel that is something worth experiencing?

[meg]

those aren't just my techniques, but the techniques of every successful player I've ever met.

[meg]

Oops, hit post instead of preview... The above was a quote by voland.

( laughs ) Meg

[Karbonopsinos]

Originally posted by voland
Karbonopsinos: You are the one living in the dark ages. In this day and age I'm astounded that anywould would still deny the fact of evolution... but again, to each his own.

That's nonsense. Evolution is no more likely than creationism. It's preferred by scientific circles because it excludes God.

As for what goes against it..., well, a whole lot:

1.) Not enough time for evolution to have occurred the way it has.

2.) Missing links

3.) Irreducible complexity. What is the advantage of developing a cornea if there's no retina to go with it?

4.) Time structure constant. 138.******* If it were off by 0.0000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000001 % at the early stages of the universe, nucleogenesis could not occur. Yes, if it were off by ONE DIGIT IN THE SEVENTY-SIXTH DECIMAL SPACE, LIFE WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE!

How is it such coincidence that the fine structure constant hit it right on the button for life? And what's more, if proton/neutron masses were 1% more or less, the higher elements would be impossible to form (that is, higher than iron), which are necessary for life, or all the elements would be RADIOACTIVE, again, impossible for life.

Explain Mr. Scientific bone-smasher, so many coincidences, so little time, and I'm still looking for those pesky missing links which are just....missing.

[ticklesuzy]

Anytime someone is simply telling someone what they want to hear, and manipulating a persons emotions / desires for their own personal libido, they are only in it for what they will get out of it.

Don't you think that's shallow?

I would not want to give myself to someone who was only acting on their own motives. That would make me feel used and less than worth the REAL effort.

Sincerity is sexy and very attractive and all that takes is honest effort.

This guy "gets laid" because he has made a bundle of $ and power and some women can't resist THAT.

He's "discoveries" and research is simply a way to get around facing insecurities and lack of ablity to really commincate with people on an honest level of some true meaningful emotions.

$ and p*ssy become meaningless when thats all you have, a series of quick f *cks can't be fulfilling.

[voland]

Meg, try to make a point when you reply. Just what the hell is on your mind?

Karbonopsinos, it sounds like you've been trained since birth to spit out those statistics. Did your father, mother, and brainwashing church shove them down your throat? Just because science may not have all the answers, is that any reason to lump everything unexplainable under the power of a man-made God? Isn't that what native americans, and every other primitive culture(s) did; create rain-gods, and hold sacrifices and whatnot to appease the unseen forces that couldn't be explained?

We've had similar conversations in the past Karbonopsinos, you bored me then with your closed-minded preachings, like you bore me now.

[Karbonopsinos]

No, actually my father, who happens to be a theoretical relativistic physicist and an atheist to boot told me about the fine structure constant.

As for primitive cultures...the most primitive culture I see nowadays is our own, where all sorts of sexual deviancy and criminality are permissible and even encouraged by society. Perversion runs rampant.

And btw, while I do agree that polytheism may be primitive, monotheism is in no way primitive....I agree it is all a matter of faith, I have no proof, but the belief in one God is by no means a primitive one.

Only a fool could think that.

[meg]

Jeezies Voland! I made the point, it's all a game to you and others that wish to follow, you refer to these people as, successful players

player: a person who participates in or is skilled at some game .
game: a contest with rules to determine a winner; an amusement or pastime

[voland]

Meg, smart people play at the game until they find a worthy partner, and then they get serious. If you go at every "potential" romance with a seriour outcome in mind, then you're going to scare most people away -- they'll smell your desperation.

And no: highlighting a word or phrase from my post is only clear to you, not to the people reading it; how the hell are we supposed to know what's going on in your mind?

[meg]

I disagree with playing games. I think a person can be themselves, be honest and find a worthy mate. I don't see the need to hurt people along the way.

Voland, you're an intelligent man. As many that read and reply to post are. I'm sure many knew the point I was making.

( smiling, as I agree to disagree with Voland )

Just because you spend time with a person, doesn't mean you want a serious relationship. People can date for years and never make a committment. I believe people should take time to explore what they are looking for. I don't think they should go about it seducing and hurting people along the way. It happens to often as it is, without an effort. Just be honest with your intentions. Don't tell someone what you think they want to hear. Don't treat them the way you think they want to be treated unless that is how you plan to always treat them. Meg